What is it with the dead?
As we have moved around Italy, there have been many monuments to dead people designed to engage living people in order to keep the dead person’s memory alive. From a truly spectacular monument like Trajan’s column to more sedate monuments that offer a bench for people to sit on and reflect, everywhere there are tombs. I understand that the Romans thought that they would live on as long as they were remembered by living people, so your tomb was designed to engage with people who didn’t even know you. But what about today’s Italians? In
visiting the monumental cemetery in Milan, I didn’t know that people could build monuments to people who have just died in the same manner as Romans. There were monuments that copied other great works, like Trajan’s column, the Last Supper, and famous icons.
These tombstones, mausoleums, and monuments were huge, made of precious stones, had stained glass and these were dedicated to one person. They reminded me of the Lincoln’s tomb in
Springfield, IL. But
that was one of our greatest presidents and his whole family buried with
him. These tombs are for individuals and
they are immense. I guess that you can
do what you want with your money, but I don’t understand the allure in spending
so much money on something that will eventually fade away.
Why not go for an earth mound like they have from Neolithic times that are still present today? Why not be burned and sprinkled around or even buried, but do you have to take up so much space saying that you’re buried there? I find cemeteries a monumental waste of space and money. This is also being written in the face of
Why not go for an earth mound like they have from Neolithic times that are still present today? Why not be burned and sprinkled around or even buried, but do you have to take up so much space saying that you’re buried there? I find cemeteries a monumental waste of space and money. This is also being written in the face of
No comments:
Post a Comment